Comments on: Optimising XNA Performance With Resource Pooling http://www.cannontrodder.net/2007/07/23/optimising-xna-performance-with-resource-pooling/ cannontrodder - Getting nothing done since 1975. Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:54:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: Are tree structures inherently bad for mark-and-sweep garbage collector performance? | Q&A System http://www.cannontrodder.net/2007/07/23/optimising-xna-performance-with-resource-pooling/comment-page-1/#comment-304 Are tree structures inherently bad for mark-and-sweep garbage collector performance? | Q&A System Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:54:20 +0000 http://www.cannontrodder.net/2007/07/23/optimising-xna-performance-with-resource-pooling/#comment-304 [...] appears although which i could possibly should pull some whacky tricks, possibly pre-allocating everything. That suggests which i can’t have numerous factors [...] [...] appears although which i could possibly should pull some whacky tricks, possibly pre-allocating everything. That suggests which i can’t have numerous factors [...]

]]> By: Are tree structures inherently bad for mark-and-sweep garbage collector performance? | DIGG LINK http://www.cannontrodder.net/2007/07/23/optimising-xna-performance-with-resource-pooling/comment-page-1/#comment-303 Are tree structures inherently bad for mark-and-sweep garbage collector performance? | DIGG LINK Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:31:28 +0000 http://www.cannontrodder.net/2007/07/23/optimising-xna-performance-with-resource-pooling/#comment-303 [...] seems though that I may have to pull some whacky tricks, probably pre-allocating everything. That means that I can’t have many things immutable, and [...] [...] seems though that I may have to pull some whacky tricks, probably pre-allocating everything. That means that I can’t have many things immutable, and [...]

]]>